Here are a few articles I've found interesting over the
last few weeks. Two trends: writers and activists are getting
increasingly disturbed by the increasingly bad scenarios from climate change
science, none of which makes its way into mainstream media coverage.
However, there are still many useful things that can be done to buffer
impacts, control damage and inspire hope.
David Holmgren, the
co-originator of permaculture, touched off a very vigorous discussion in the
climate change / peak oil blogsphere with a new article in which he said some
quite surprising things. "Crash on Demand: Welcome to the Brown Tech
Future."
In his reply, Albert Bates came up with a grid on which he placed
various writers and their viewpoints, with the vertical axis measuring optimism
and pessimism about the future, and the horizontal axis tracking peaceful or
non-peaceful transformation. The debate about which messages can be
effective, and whose predictions will be most accurate continue...but this
discussion is not one that will be relevant or useful for the vast majority of
New Yorkers, even those concerned about sustainability and resilience.
What to tell those folks is a whole 'nother question, which I'm grappling
with through the film screenings and facilitated discussion events I'm setting
up in various locations.
***
Hidden funding from
billionaires to climate change denialists. A Drexel University study shows the biggest funding streams
to 118 climate change denial groups come
from a few conservative foundations that use concealed, untraceable
donations.
Some post-Christmas satire from John Michael Greer. Conservative
republicans are fond of citing the Bible, but there really isn't that much
Biblical support for cutting benefits to the poor, making as much money as you
can, etc. Greer suggests they may be more aligned with an obscure
religion that enthusiastically endorses sociopathic greed: Satanism.
Eight graphs on climate and energy issues from 2013: global temps
going way up, carbon dioxide levels passes 400 PPM for first time; record
number of climate deniers in Congress; arctic ice and the price of solar power
both decline; renewable power keeps growing...yada yada.
A review of recent climate science contains some increasingly dire near-term scenarios. One degree C is equal to 1.8 degrees F, and we're already .85 C above the average pre-industrial planetary temperature. New reports project higher temperatures sooner than those from just a few years ago - such as a 3.5 to 4C (6.3 - 7.2F) rise by mid-century or sooner. IPCC reports are very conservative and don't include feedback loops that could accelerate warming, such as a release of methane as the floor of the Arctic Ocean warms up or the Siberian permafrost melts.
[Thom Hartmann has an effective ten minute video called Last Hours. I used it in the January screening of climate change videos in Long Island City, along with Climate Change 101 from Al Gore's Climate Reality Project and "Do the Math," from 350.org.]
Arctic ice melting ahead of schedule. An ongoing US Department
of Energy-backed research project led by a US Navy scientist predicts that the
Arctic could lose its summer sea ice cover as early as 2016 - 84 years ahead of conventional model
projections.
7 things everyone knows
about energy that just ain't so. Mark Twain once said,
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you
know for sure that just ain't so." And, there are many, many things that
the public and policymakers know for sure about energy that just ain't
so. Kurt Cobb goes through a long listof fossil fuel industry deceptions picked up by a gullible media.